Why Venture Capitalists Should Support Barack Obama
The following was written by Julius Genachowski, founding partner of LaunchBox Digital and special advisor to General Atlantic, and Mark Gorenberg, a partner with Hummer Winblad Venture Partners.
This is a defining moment in our history and the most important election of our lifetimes. We face unprecedented economic, energy, environmental, and healthcare challenges. It is critical that the United States have a President who can respond to these challenges, regain the respect that we once enjoyed across the globe, and enact a plan to strengthen America’s competiveness in the 21st century. Senator Barack Obama believes America is a nation where the power of innovation and the world’s strongest work ethic can come together to provide solutions in these hard economic times. Senator Obama is the leader we need now.
Barack Obama has laid out a comprehensive plan for America called the “Blueprint for Change.” These proposals incorporate the belief that science, technology, and innovation are critical parts of the solution to America’s most pressing problems.
Senator Barack Obama launched his campaign for the Presidency in Springfield, Illinois on February 10, 2007 with a speech that let us know at the campaign’s earliest moments that technology and innovation would be key components of an Obama Administration. In November 2007, he gave a landmark speech on the Google campus in Silicon Valley and laid out his comprehensive Technology & Innovation Plan. Since then, the role of science and technology has appeared in Obama’s speeches on the economy, energy, health care, urban policy and government reform – together, comprising an unprecedented Innovation Agenda for America. Just last month, the Obama campaign rolled out its science plan with the endorsement of 61 Nobel Laureate Scientists, which was followed by the recent endorsement of all three American scientists who won Nobel Prizes this fall.
Barack Obama’s Technology and Innovation plan details his proposals in six key areas: ensure an open Internet, create a transparent and connected democracy, encourage a modern communications infrastructure, prepare all of our children for the 21st century economy, improve America’s competitiveness, and employ science and technology to solve our nation’s most pressing problems.
As part of his Innovation Agenda, Barack Obama will:
- Deploy a 21st century information infrastructure, and bring universal access to broadband to all of America’s communities.
- Lower health care costs and reduce medical errors by investing in electronic medical records.
- Invest in climate-friendly energy development by investing $150 billion over the next ten years (and creating five million new jobs) to advance the next generation of biofuels and fuel infrastructure accelerate the commercialization of plug-in hybrids, promote commercial-scale renewable energy, and begin the transition to a new digital energy grid. The plan will work to ensure that 25% of our electricity comes from renewable sources by 2025 and implement a cap and trade program to reduce greenhouse emissions 80 percent by 2050.
- Make a national commitment to science education and training by recruiting some of America’s best minds to teach K-12 math and science and by tripling the number of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowships.
- Restore integrity to science policy to ensure that decisions that can be informed by science are made on the basis of the strongest possible scientific evidence.
- Double the federal investment in basic research.
- Encourage innovation to flourish by making the R&D tax credit permanent and streamlining our patent system.
- Reform immigration to further enable high-skill immigrants to contribute to the U.S. economy.
- Support regional innovation clusters to support American entrepreneurs.
- Use technology to build a 21st century government that is open and participatory, relying on the best minds and technologies to address our country’s problems while generating significant cost savings.
- Appoint the nation’s first Chief Technology Officer (CTO) to ensure that our government operates most efficiently for the 21st century.
Barack Obama also understands that startups and small businesses create two-thirds of new jobs and will be the engine behind our next economic recovery. He not only supported the recent financial market rescue legislation, but he has also proposed a separate Small Business Emergency Rescue Plan to ensure small business can receive capital during this tough economic period. His plan includes both a zero capital gains rate for investments in startups and small businesses and a $250 million fund to create a national network of private company incubators to support small business growth.
These are just some of the reasons we endorse Barack Obama for President of the United States and why the venture capital and private equity communities should enthusiastically support him as well.
Julius Genachowski is a Founding Partner of LaunchBox Digital and Special Advisor with General Atlantic. Mark Gorenberg is a Managing Director at Hummer Winblad Venture Partners.
Related posts:









amy said on October 21, 2008
#8?
Dan Primack said on October 21, 2008
fixed amy. formatting error on my part.
hapalong said on October 21, 2008
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/taxes/Factsheet_Tax_Plan_FINAL.pdf
re: the zero capital gains on investments in new and small businesses. this is taken from obama’s tax policy pdf on page 3. on page 4, it states that he’ll make carried interest subject to personal income tax. i’m not in the vc world, but based on how i understand carried interest works, it seems to me that these two positions are conflicting. if i’m correct (and if i’m not, please correct me as i fully admit to not completely understanding the difference, if there is one), it’s confirmation of how i understand obama to be – pretty picture lacking in depth or even worse – constantly changing details. so we’re asked to make huge assumptions that he’ll be centrist and bipartisan, even though he has no record of being either.
case in point – he spoke frequently of raising payroll taxes during the primaries, but that position is oddly not included in his tax policy pdf. does he support this ill-conceived idea or not?
it’s very unclear what policies he’ll actually support, so one is then led to assess him on his philosophies. this quote, again from his tax policy pdf is most disturbing:
“Obama will ask the wealthiest 2% of families to give back a portion of the taxes they have received over the past eight years to ensure we are restoring fairness and returning to fiscal
responsibility.”
it’s not taxes the top 2% have received, it’s money from hard work that they EARNED and deserve to keep. the ability for the government to tax families is incredibly powerful – the government tells me i have to give “X” amount of money or i will go to jail. that shouldn’t be taken lightly nor should it ever be implied that a tax cut is a gift from the government for those who’ve paid taxes – substantial amounts at that. it’s the other way around. let’s not forget that the government serves at the privilege of the people.
Brian said on October 21, 2008
Thank you for the opinion, Mark. I agree that most of these are great points, and that most of these specific policies should be ‘objectives’ for us all.
But, respectfully, a question or two (or 4):
* Why should the Federal government be involved in any of this?
* Why should we (individually or collectively) be subject to the dictation/imposition of policies we may or may not agree with? Certainly you don’t agree (and expect to agree) with *all* objectives of the government?
* In a free market society, shouldn’t industry be taking care of these things?
* Wouldn’t it be best if we chose to do these things on our own?
I’ll look forward to your response (if you plan to respond to comments), and thank you again for the opinion/article.
Chris said on October 21, 2008
Mark is a Tool! He is typical of those who take campaign promises hook, line and sinker! Some of these items on the agenda are so sweeping e.g. #10, #11 you’d have to be silly to think Obama can deliver them. Well on second thought he did rid Chicago of its governemental corruption….oh wait he didn’t do that, it remained and thrived while he was their just as before; so much for change. I guess he’s saving all of these wonders for the presidency. When people vote based on promises made that will benefit the individual or individual groups then we will keep getting into offices those that make the most promises i.e. we get the best talkers! Congress is full of them!
Craig said on October 21, 2008
The basic message from Obama is “I will take care of you all”, translation, “I will spend and continue to throw money at problems in the hopes they will go away”. Obama will raise the corporate tax rate to the second highest in the world. This will cause corporations, by the way, the same ones that employ the Americans he wants to increase taxes on, to do more with less. How will they get by? Make employment cuts in order to survive. But that’s ok, because Father Obama will take care of you once you’re laid off and on unemployment! Obama fails to recognize that he is will be attempting to squeeze blood out of a stone.
McCain wants to give this country the tools to take care of ourselves. That is the difference between the two candidates. One wants to take care of you (Obama IS the Messiah according to Farrakhan, unfortunately Obama seems to take that literally). McCain wants to help you take care of yourself.
Bob Newton said on October 21, 2008
Someone slipped Julius and Mark a cup of Kool-Aid at the last PE Hub event. I have three major problems with this essay:
Obama has a funny way of making promises: He says “I will…” but the predicate of the sentence is not an action but a result. For example, “I will Deploy a 21st century information infrastructure, and bring universal access to broadband to all of America’s communities.” Or, “I will Restore integrity to science policy to ensure that decisions that can be informed by science are made on the basis of the strongest possible scientific evidence.” What’s missing is the action in between and an explanation of how the action will produce the result. This is true of every one of the promises listed above.
The second problem is even more fundamental: Most of the things he wants to do are not legitimate functions of the federal government under the Constitution.
The third is his use of the word “investment” in place of “targeted spending” which is the only thing government can do. In nearly every case in history, the productivity of government “investment” in anything (education, for example) has proven woefully inferior to that of private investment, where it has not been actually corrupt.
Gire said on October 22, 2008
Mark, you should be bleating, because you are a sheep… “Baaaaa”…. under obama the percent of adults that are non-taxpayers will be over 50%, and they will take control of the country’s politics… rich intellectuals paved the way for the communist revolution and you are an heir to the tradition
Craig said on October 22, 2008
“Democracy is a form of government that cannot long survive, for as soon as the people learn that they have a voice in the fiscal policies of the government, they will move to vote for themselves all the money in the treasury, and bankrupt the nation.” Karl Marx
“It’s not that I want to punish your success; I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you that they’ve got a chance to success, too. I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.” Barack Obama
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/11670.html
http://www.heritage.org/research/Taxes/wm1973.cfm
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2008/09/how_will_obamas_tax_plan_impac.html
Brian said on October 22, 2008
Thanks for the Quote, Craig. Here’s another, similar:
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.”
– Unknown, but often attributed to Professor Alexander Tytler.
Bruce B. said on October 22, 2008
The problem with both candidates is that their programs/agendas/platforms/whatever are for the most part promises the candidate is not able to deliver on his own — and therefore somewhat hollow.
For example, in Obama’s agenda, look at the first few points:
1. Not a govt function. Could try to mandate FCC to do as a reg, and it it could be pushed through the commission, the legal heavy telcos will take it to court and probably prevail.
2. EMR adoption by itself, already underway, is not going to materially reduce health care costs.
3. Requires congress to come up with $150B. (Personally, I’d be happy if the gov’t could just come up with some stable, understood, policy for energy solutions which investors and business can work with and don’t change as frequently as I change underwear.)
4. Requires congress to approve increase in NSF budget. How are the “best minds” going to be convinced to serve?
5. He would be in position to accomplish this.
6. Requires congress to come up with funding.
You get the picture.
The same can be said for McCain’s lists. Most require action by parties he can only attempt to influence and persuade.
All in all, it reminds me of B-Plan pitches with hockey stick revenue and income projections with incomplete assumptions, but packaged in a slick Powerpoint presentation.
freelance writing jobs said on July 31, 2010
I had trouble viewing in Chrome but it works fine in IE. Anway, the post is good. I am delighted to have found this.