|
New York (Finally) Notices London
|
|||||
|
My partner Wayne and I recently were in Europe and England (that’s the correct way to think about them, too) raising money for Apex VI. We came away with some impressions that may be relevant for the coming year or two. While the growth rate in Europe has been anemic for the past decade, it is now showing signs of robustness (for them) with Germany leading the way projecting a 1.4-1.8% GDP growth rate for the coming year (as witnessed by the extraordinary spending by consumers) and, on the investment side, surplus funds to invest. With the Euro being strong, they are looking toward the US to place their bets. In the alternative asset area, this especially means Venture, because most European fund managers have gotten their fill of large buyout funds, so they are turning to Venture and Middle-Market buyouts. London is reminiscent of Silicon Valley in the mid-90’s, only instead of programmers driving Ferraris, we have Russians driving Bentleys. London is now the world’s largest and wealthiest financial market, with New York coming in a declining second. The excessive regulations on the US equity markets are making the London exchanges even more attractive. Combine this with the very large influence on currency and commodity trading, and it looks as though London will be the city of choice for new money (such as the Russians) to park their cash and clog up West End restaurants. The strength of the Pound makes this even more pronounced, which is why there were a lot of Brits shopping in New York this Christmas—prices looked very cheap to them. All of this leads me to conclude that these market forces have finally been noticed in New York—witness Senator Schumer and Mayor Bloomberg’s op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal regarding Sarbanes Oxley and other regulatory burdens on US Exchanges. They know that NYC is losing business to London and if something is not done, their tax base will be eroded. There are very few companies in NYC that are not financial services companies, whereas in the 50’s there were bunches of them. So, look for even more pressure for regulatory relief and maybe we will have a Tech IPO market afterall.
Most Popular Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
















December 20th, 2006 at 9:13 am
Sitting in my office in London and staring at the erotic gherkin - I am pondering some of your points. European investors are interested in US Venture and mid-markets but for how much longer?
In my piece “My VC and your VC sitting by the fire” published on this site and my own http://www.evcj.com, I show how European VCs have significantly better returns on investments than US VCs. Despite better efficiencies than their American counterparts, European VCs are still plagued by underfunding but this trend is starting to shift.
Mid-market buyouts is another area that is very interesting to European investors but will they continue to invest in the US? There are lots of family run business in Germany and Belgium that are 100 years old, have great brands and are being run by a nephew of the founder. These businesses are now coming up for sale and can be very profitable turnarounds for European mid-market private equity firms. (For more on this topic, check out “Mittelstand Takeovers” in the Features section of the Hub’s sister site http://www.evcj.com.)
The next time you’re in London, give me a bell and we’ll have lunch as this city is now home to some of the best restaurants in the world too.
Good Luck with Apex VI!