|
Public-to-Public M&A Deals – Should There Be a Shareholder Rep?
|
||||||
|
Somebody recently asked us if we expected to be appointed the post-closing representative for the former Data Domain shareholders, regardless of who bought them (the company is currently “in play” with both EMC and Netapp making bids). After all, many of Data Domain’s major shareholders are VCs (including Greylock Partners, New Enterprise Associates and Sutter Hill Ventures), even though the company went public in 2007. My initial answer to the questioner was “no comment.” This is not a finalized deal and, even if SRS were involved, it would breach the confidentiality restrictions that we agree to before the merger agreement is signed. However, even more fundamental to the answer is that since Data Domain is a publicly traded company, it is highly unlikely that the transaction will have any need for a shareholder rep. Most mergers with a public company target are done on an “as-is” basis with no escrow and few, if any, post-closing obligations of the shareholders (however a New York Law Journal article from 2004 suggested that escrows be considered in acquisitions of public companies). As a public company, the target is subject to the regulatory oversight and reporting requirements of the SEC and their trading exchanges. In addition, public companies must have independent audits and are scrutinized by their underwriters and the analyst community. Information is, therefore, a plenty and independently verified. The merger is just closed and that’s that. If it is eventually learned that there was some fraud committed, the buyer can typically go after the board and/or management in their individual capacities. It is, however, very difficult if not impossible to “sue the public” when the company is publicly owned. Additionally, there are securities law implications to having an That’s not the way things work when the target company is private. There is no public scrutiny of the target company and independent audits are not necessarily performed. Given a desire by both parties to close the deal within a reasonable timeframe, indemnification provisions are heavily negotiated and, to protect the acquirer from unexpected losses due to merger term breaches, or from differences in expected working capital, escrows or holdbacks are usually required. Therefore, unlike public deals, sales of private companies need someone to speak and act for the selling shareholders if a claim for indemnification is made or some other post-closing adjustment to merger consideration is required. That’s where the shareholder rep comes in. Prior to the merger, a board of directors and a management team represented the target company’s shareholders. But, after closing, the board resigns and the management team now either works for the That’s why they require the selling shareholders to appoint one party who can speak and act for them with absolute discretion and authority – the shareholder representative. Mark Vogel is co-founder and managing director of Shareholder Representative Services. This post was co-authored by fellow SRS co-founder Paul Koenig.
Most Commented Posts |
 |
 |
July 7th, 2009 at 11:20 am
I was hoping you might be able to clear this up for me; I was under the impression that once VC’s bring a firm public they often pass off the majority of shares back to their LP’s? I imagined they would hold on to shares if they were directors but usually cash out in a reasonably quick time if not.
July 8th, 2009 at 12:53 am
While terms vary among underwriting agreements, selling shareholders, including the VCs, might be subject to a lock-up period which could last six months or longer. During that time, the shareholders are restricted in what they can do with their shares. However, after that time, depending on the terms of their limited partnership, VCs typically distribute the public company shares to their LPs or possibly sell the shares and distribute the proceeds. Holding the public company shares is an option, but I’ve not seen that too often. You might want to put the question on Ask the VC (http://www.askthevc.com/) where Jason Mendelson and Brad Feld answer questions about VC operations.
April 19th, 2010 at 6:36 pm
Substantially, the post is really the sweetest on this precious topic. I suit in with your conclusions and definitely will eagerly look forward to your coming updates. Simply saying thanks will not simply just be enough, for the amazing lucidity in your writing. I can at once grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any kind of updates. Genuine work and also much success in your business efforts!
April 19th, 2010 at 8:41 pm
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about this and I benefit from learning about this subject. If possible, as you gain facts, please add to this blog with more information. I have found it enormously useful.