|
Is Steve Pagliuca The Next Senator from Massachusetts?
|
|||
|
I’m told that candidate Pagliuca is a near-certainty, which raises two questions: (1) How will this affect Bain; and (2) Does he have a shot to win? The first answer is “relatively little.” Bain has lots of experience with this sort of thing, based on the electoral ambitions of firm co-founder Mitt Romney. In fact, Romney’s first race was for this very seat, against Kennedy back in 1994. That campaign included the regular apparences of laid-off factory workers from a Bain portfolio company, who were none too pleased with the future governor. When Romney ran for president, Bain conducted an in-house investigation to uncover any skeletons from the Romney era (PR or otherwise) that might have embarassed the firm. Expect Bain to do the same again, but for the more recent era. From a management perspective, losing Pagliuca (either temporarily or permanently) won’t be a crushing blow. He’s obviously one of Bain’s leading lights, but he also is just one of 30 managing directors. Bain switched to a committee model following Romney’s departure, in part to handle this type of situation. Ok, let’s now move onto something I know a bit less about: Pagliuca’s chances at the polls. This also happens to matter at Bain, since a Pagliuca loss would probably mean he’d be back in his office by February at the latest (this is a special election, so the timetable is accelerated). My gut feeling is that Pagliuca might want to call Steve Rattner about that house in DC. His current competition currently looks like this:
I’m certainly not saying Pagliuca has anything close to a lock, particularly since he’s a “Wall Street guy,” has never been on the stump nor has he had his life dissected by the Boston media (no, puff pieces after you buy the Celtics do not count). Then there is the issue of his positions on “the issues.” He’s clearly on the lefthand side of the ledger, given that he donated to Obama rather than to Romney (unlike virtually everyone else at Bain). But still an unknown. What’s going for Pagliuca, though, is not just the money or the Celtics-related profile (although both are important in a short race). He’s also got the successful businessman thing, which could be persuasive for the state’s conservative-leaning unenrolled who might take Democratic primary ballots in order to vote for the least-objectionable. Better than taking a Republican ballot when that primary’s winner is likely to get slaughtered come the general. Here are some additional thoughts I shared earlier today from the laundry room: |
![]() |
![]() |























September 15th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
I’d love to see Pagliuca vs. Scott Brown. Clearly MA is an uphill battle for a Republican but I wouldn’t be so sure that a strong candidate like Brown is ‘likely to get slaughtered’
September 15th, 2009 at 8:40 pm
I don’t see the angle for Steve P. The govt is already heavily leveraged as it is so the LBO opportunity isn’t there. Unless Steve is going to go in and fire everyone (good luck with that)
September 19th, 2009 at 11:40 pm
Hi, I saw you’re trying to run for the seat in the Senate, since our “Great Senator Edward M. Kennedy passing. I am more interested in what you have to say.