Unleash Entrepreneurs From Obamanomics To Create More Jobs
Historically 70% of job growth in the U.S. has come from the small business sector – including the world of start-ups in Silicon Valley and elsewhere. While small businesses are known for their agility – out of necessity – they are also much more susceptible to the vagaries and uncertainties emanating from Washington, DC these days. This presents a daunting challenge to entrepreneurs, who commit their personal wealth to hire employees in anticipation of economic and business growth and resulting higher profits.
Adding employees for a small business requires a level of certainty regarding each prospective employee’s cost and productivity. Uncertainty is the enemy of small business job growth and Washington continues to add layer upon complex layer of uncertainty at the foot of small business management. Through increased health care costs, carbon regulations and resulting taxes, proposed higher capital gains taxes and a host of new and yet evolving regulatory requirements – the Government has almost forced a “No Hiring” policy on many small businesses. On a risked adjusted basis, its tough for most small business to justify hiring – over and above an absolute minimum – at least until the implications of these changes can become clear – with time. And time is what we do not have.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs clearly points to our national priority today – put America back to work. It’s time to step back from the current health care morass and restart the reform effort – with a focus on regulatory changes that can increases the competitiveness of health care and reduce costs. Let’s suspend initiatives that will increase taxes – at least until there are more of us working to pay those taxes. If we want to stimulate the economy, let’s do it with policies that encourage spending and investment in the private sector. If we want job growth, its time we focus on encouraging the job creators to start hiring as opposed to forcing many of them onto the side lines.
America’s small businesses, including our start-ups here in Silicon Valley, are the machines of innovation and job growth. Job creation in America will be led by these innovators and entrepreneurs. If we want to truly unleash their potential, we need clarity and simplicity from our Government leaders and regulators. What we are getting instead is management by Government fiat, a wholesale restructuring of the regulatory environment, new Government mandates with uncertain implications and a rhetorical assault on success. While the Government is focused on bailing out Wall Street – perhaps they could just get out of the way of the rest of us.
The stakes could not be higher. 2009 saw the U.S. economy challenged in ways unparalleled in recent decades. A weakened banking system, the housing market in free fall, the dollar under tremendous pressure in global markets are all reflective of the breadth and depth of our continued economic crisis. But true measure of the challenges we face however lie in U.S. unemployment statistics.
In 2009, more than 20 million people collected unemployment benefits in the U.S. – a record. The year ended with the domestic jobless rate in excess of 10 percent – a figure that excludes those who have become frustrated and ended their search for employment. While year end figures showed hopeful signs that the rate of job loss was slowing, we are far from being out of the woods when it comes to putting America back to work – 15 million Americans are out of work as we enter 2010.
Through a variety of stimulus and “make work” programs, the U.S. Federal Government has sought to jump-start the economy and reverse the contagion of job loss and economic contraction. With hundreds of billions of stimulus dollars committed – the early results to date can only be considered disappointing. Shovel-ready projects were found lacking, statistics around job creation have universally been cited for their exaggerations and where there has been job growth, much of it has been in short term hiring for “stimulus projects” or adding employees to government roles. Nowhere have we seen the type of sustainable, long term job creation that will be required to restore our economy’s vitality, put 15 million of our fellow citizen’s back to work, support the growing standard of living all American’s desire or provide the economic base our country desperately needs in order to pay its bills let alone meet our debt obligations. Simply stated, the Federal Government can not and will not create the jobs our economy requires in order to be successful and viable on a long term basis. Its time to unleash the potential of our entrepreneurs – and for the Government to get out of their way.
Bob Ackerman is the founder and managing director of Allegis Capital (www.allegiscapital.com), a seed and early-stage venture firm headquartered in Palo Alto, California. Ackerman has worked with more than 50 corporate investment partners over the past 20 years as both a venture capitalist and a startup executive. Read his past blog posts here



mark said on January 14, 2010
As a silicon valley CEO, I just want to point out this article is complete garbage.
Joe said on January 14, 2010
As a serial entrepreneur who has started and sold two businesses to fortune 500 companies, I agree w/ the first commenter, Mark.
Obama’s policies are much more pro-small business and pro-technology/innovation than Bush’s.
Bob Ackerman said on January 15, 2010
Joe and Mark –
Would enjoying hearing more on your thoughts. I too have built two business – with and without venture capital. When you are growing a business out of cash flow – when there is no ready trough of venture capital investing (or bank loans) – life is pretty complicated for a small business manager. In Silicon Valley we are somewhat insultated from some of the pressures many small business face when it comes to hiring and investing in growth. We benefit from an infrastrucutre that provides us with capital – assuming we are solving a problem. Many start-ups are funded with a view to having product in the market 2 years down the road – they are not as concerned with selling a product today.
When the wheels came off the train in late 2008 – -did you both cut your spending plans in order to stretch your cash? Did the budget reductions effect hiring plans? Congratulations if you avoided both of these decisions – you are clealry in the minority.
Ram said on January 15, 2010
Wasn’t worth the time it took to read this blog post.
Or, for that matter, to finish writing this critiq…
Kyle said on January 15, 2010
I don’t recall the article comparing Obama’s policies to Bush’s. The focus on the article is how policies are impacting us in today’s current situation. It is broken, that much is clear.
Matt said on January 15, 2010
I am a serial entrepreneur/CEO on the East Coast — and I am against big government, taxes, overregulation in general. SarBox, for instance, has been nothing but a pain and drag for startups.
But without concrete examples the post sounds like a political opinion, not a business piece.
Which or your portfolio companies have put their growth on hold because of uncertainty about climate legislation or healthcare reform?
Also, are you going to leave venture capital or shut down your fund if carried interest is taxed at a higher rate?
Maschel said on January 15, 2010
After reading this post I am inclined to agree with Mark and Joe. At the very best, this post is a mish mash of popular news that provides the opportunity for a shameless plug (at the end). Nonetheless some points of contention are as follows:
“Adding employees for a small business requires a level of certainty regarding each prospective employee’s cost and productivity. Uncertainty is the enemy of small business†– UNCERTAINTY IS THE ENEMY OF ANY LIVING ORGANISM. IT IS WHY WE HAVE RISK ANALYSIS, HEDGING, INSURANCE (IN ITS MANY FORMS)…
“On a risked adjusted basis, its tough for most small business to justify hiring – over and above an absolute minimum†– WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO… MANAGEMENT 101 THE LABOR INPUT MUST BE MAXIMED AS PER THE OUTPUT, ABOVE THAT POINT IS LIKE PUTTING FLAMES TO DOLLAR BILLS!
“America’s small businesses, including our start-ups here in Silicon Valley, are the machines of innovation and job growth. Job creation in America will be led by these innovators and entrepreneurs. If we want to truly unleash their potential, we need clarity and simplicity from our Government leaders and regulators. What we are getting instead is management by Government fiat, a wholesale restructuring of the regulatory environment, new Government mandates with uncertain implications and a rhetorical assault on success. While the Government is focused on bailing out Wall Street – perhaps they could just get out of the way of the rest of us.†– THE CRISIS WE FACE IS OF A MACROeconomic NATURE, IT AFFECTS US ALL; WHAT DO YOU THINK WIPED OUT THE CREDIT LINES THAT SO MANY SMALL BUSINESS USE TO BRIDGE THE OPERATING GAP? OR RAISED THE RATES OF CREDIT CARDS THAT MANY ENTREPRENUERS USE TO GET THE BALL ROLLING TO ASTRONIOMICAL HIGHS?
AND I COULD GO ON AND ON BUT LETS NOT…
I am curious to know though, how would you solve the problems we now face? Would you just open the flood gates and let capitalism roam free… because that too is a slippery slope explored to varying degrees by many before also to little success.
In closing I will say that a better post would have been to provide USEFUL information as to how startups and small business can strive given the new normal that may exist as a result of the changes in Washington. But from your writing I take it you are more a salesman than a management guru of any sort. Fact is, the truly resilient startup or small business (those who have weathered the storm and stayed relevant because of true innovation) will adapt and find ways to grow and remain in harmonious existence regardless of what lies ahead of them… The ability to find creative solutions in the bottom of the ninth and win the game is what defines the entrepreneur!!
Bob Ackerman said on January 15, 2010
The post is not intended to be political – interesting to see it viewed through that lens. The simple point is the greater the uncertainty associated with making an investment (hiring by way of example) the less likely the investment will be made. When we look at small business – in most cases the decision to hire is made by an entreprenuer owner who is committing their personal resource (cash) to add to the payroll. The more questions you have about the environment in which you are investing – the less likely you are to make the investment. Its not politics – its human nature and sound economics. On focusing on the current directives from Washington, my point is they are adding to uncertainty when clarity is needed. Look at the over night health care developments – yesterday everyone was getting taxed on “Cadillac” health care plans – today, you are excluded for 5 years if you are in a Union. Tomorrow? Many will adopt a “wait and see” approach.
As for Carried Interest Matt – my firm is doing fine and will continue to do so. I’m sure the Carried Interest debate will have an impact of some – perhaps many. There is no doubt that tax policies have an impact on investing behavior (tax incentives to buy housed). How much will any chance in Carried Interest affect venture – who knows? What I think you may see is investors shifting to later stage investing – to avoid longer holding periods. Would be a shame..
Lee said on January 15, 2010
Agree with all the posters. The author just trots out a bunch of useless sloganeering.
This is a bit surprising coming from the managing partner of a respected venture firm who to be fair to him perhaps knows more specifics about how he would have government get out of the way but decided not discuss them in an article about getting out of the way.
I have a specific for you if there were a Public Option or Medicare for all option small businesses would not have to deal with burden and administrative issues surrounding health care benefits and could focus on just hiring there employees and paying competitive salaries.
Craig said on January 15, 2010
You’re spot on Mr. Ackerman. It will likely require many arguments and much time to educate those who believe gov’t solves problems rather than exacerbates them. You are to be commended for being outspoken in such a challenging space, such as the contemporary Silicon Valley. I am convinced that they are ignorant of the region’s libertarian roots.
Matthew Putman said on January 15, 2010
Yes. Very disappointing. This has been historically America’s strength, providing fast money to small companies, which result in jobs. SBIR and NIH Grants for instance. The problem is that all of those are small compared to the big stimulus money that seems to be unavailable to the creativity centers in our economy. As an entrepreneur I appreciate the risk and the blog.
Bob Ackerman said on January 15, 2010
A few pieces to add to our dialog… Health care reform is absolutely essential to the viability of our economy.. No argument from me. My concern is focused on the uncertainty around the health care reform product. Until we see the final bill, it is not clear what the implications will be but the uncertainty is clearly there. It is also not clear how much reform will actually result from this bill. Revoking anti-trust exemptions from the insurance industry, allowing insurance to be bought across state lines, allowing small business to pool their purchasing power, prohibiting the decline of coverage for pre-existing conditions, allowing the importation of pharmaceuticals combined with tort reform would have combined to increase the competitive environment for insurance and put downward pressure on insurance rates. Not sure how much of this we will get from the current legislation – so we all wait.
Had a chance to have lunch with a serial entrepreneur who started a new business two years ago. He had read my post on the subject of Small Businesses and Job Creation. He pointed out that he is building his business based on his net worth and his personal cash flow – and a small bank loan – no venture capital to cushion him from the realities of the market. He put it rather succinctly – “I have to live on what I can kill. I can’t afford to take the risk that the opportunity will be there – I need to see it. Anything that inhibits that visibility – holds me back. I have very little margin for error.”
Least some think this is about politics – its not. It’s about economics. In understanding what drives investment and entrepreneurism, I would refer all to two media pieces that I can across today – one from the very liberal Portland Oregonian and the other from the New Yorker. The Oregonian comment is related to the proposal to raise state income taxes in Oregon to 11.1% (even though those taxes will only affect slightly more than 2% of the population…
The liberal Portland Oregonian has editorialized against the new taxes, which it says would target “the very businesses and employers that Oregon is depending on to lead an economic recovery, start hiring again and pay the wages that support state services.”
The article in the New Yorker (by Malcolm Gladwell) can be found at http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/01/18/100118fa_fact_gladwell
jeff said on January 16, 2010
i assume your firm doesn’t invest in green technology? hard to complain about the stimulus if you are one of the recipients of the $$billions that have been directed to those companies. i would also question your facts on the effectiveness of the stimulus program — over 90% of our portfolio directly or indirectly felt the lift of the stimulus in the 4th quarter…very few accomplished economists (of either political party) would dispute the positive effects.
Bob Ackerman said on January 17, 2010
We don’t invest in cleantech or greentech so you are correct that we are not feeding at that particular trough. I do beleive there are real opportunities in those spaces but remain concerned about too much money being invested by too many managers with too little relevant expertise. As for stimulus spending, the dollars are being deployed much slower than anticipated (less of a pop as a result) and I think the delay on shovel ready projects is reasonably well documented – hence the less than promised/hoped for level of job creation..
Fred Patterson said on January 24, 2010
I agree with you, Bob. Obamanomics has promised much but delivered little. Both the major legislative initiatives of Health Care and Cap and Trade will detrimentally affect the ability of small businesses to grow. Thankfully, neither are likely to be enacted now. The lip service paid to the importance of small business to our economy has not translated into action.
Case in point: the inability of our Congress to re-authorize the 28-year-old Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program. Without legislative action by Jan 31st, the program will die. DOD did independently reauthorize their portion of it (to 30 Sep 2010), being fearful of the inability of the Congress to act. Read about what’s happened and what the status of this legislation is on http://www.SBIRreauthorization.com.
With regard to Innovation you might be interested to read my SBIR Playbook column of 20 November 2009: “Is America losing its ability to innovate?” (http://sbircoach.blogspot.com/2009/11/is-america-losing-its-ability-to.html).
So, I agree Bob. Small business job creation is what will bring us out of the economic doldrums we’re in. Obamanomics, at least as we’ve seen it implemented to date, won’t get that done.
Stacee Rollheiser said on October 1, 2010
If they do they know their sales will suffer. The Chinese used a more natural plant preparation for their treatment instead of the synthetic version found in ephedra diet pills.