Home    |     About peHUB    |     Contact Us    |     Contributors    |         Log In    


Dan Primack

Last Week: VC Fundraising Up — This Week: VC Fundraising Down

Posted on: July 12th, 2010
ReTweet
2 CommentsReprints

Last week I gave three reasons to downplay a Dow Jones report about how VC fundraising was on the upswing. One of them was that a similar report was coming from the NVCA and Thomson Reuters, which would tell a much different story.

Indeed, the NVCA/TR data is out, and it says that just 38 U.S.-based VC funds raised $1.9 billion in Q2 2010. That’s a 49% decrease from Q1 totals, and the first half of 2010 is off nearly 19% from the first half of 2009.

As I originally wrote, I’m not saying one set of data is better than the other (even though I get paid by Thomson Reuters). Instead, my best advice is to view the combined reports as inconclusive…

You can download the NVCA/TR report here, or view it below:

Q2 10 VC Fundraising Release FINAL




Most Commented Posts

2 Responses to “Last Week: VC Fundraising Up — This Week: VC Fundraising Down”

  1. Lynn-Ann Gries Says:

    Dan,
    Thanks for bringing to light the challenges involved in data collection. Our organization takes the lead in collecting and publishing the amount of venture investment just in Northeast Ohio and it is a laborious task. http://www.jumpstartinc.org/Docs/2010%20Documents/01.26.10%202009_Venture%20Capital%20Report_PM.pdf

    When two reputable data collectors come up with contradictory information I think the only option is to call it inconclusive, as you have wisely done. Given the uncertainty in the data, the only thing to do is talk to entrepreneurs to get real, if only anecdotal, data. Here in NEO I know that our entrepreneurs are definitely feeling more Thompson” than “Dow Jones” - growth capital is very difficult to come by.

    As you point out, big funds are not necessarily the most successful funds. I’d like to see venture turn back to its roots of smaller funds, managed by a handful of close-knit partners who have relevant backgrounds in the industries in which they are investing. Smaller funds mean smaller management fees and I think that’s a good thing. Venture investing becomes more personal, the principals have everything riding on their ability to generate great IRRs (rather than collecting current income via huge management fees.) So, I’m actually okay if the total dollars invested in venture nationally goes down, just to long as the number of firms managing the money increases.

  2. JumpStart: IdeaExchange Blog » Blog Archive » What Changes Do You Want to See in VC? Says:

    [...] week, Dan Primack continued his discussion from the week before on peHUB about the numbers being published on national trends in Venture [...]

Leave a Reply










SEO Positive Gets Aristopaws Contract Posted on: January 30th, 2012
Atlanta Startups Seek Silicon Valley Cash Posted on: January 27th, 2012





Copyright © 2006-2012, Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Site by Pixel Bridge