Home    |     PE Team    |     Contributors    |     About peHUB    |     Reuters Private Equity    |    
peHUB Team 
 
Dan Primack 2516 articles posted
11-20-2009
11-19-2009
11-18-2009
11-17-2009
Alexander Haislip 294 articles posted
Alastair Goldfisher 118 articles posted
Mark Cecil 9 articles posted
Lawrence Aragon 100 articles posted
Amanda Palmer 32 articles posted
David Toll 38 articles posted
Joanna Glasner 45 articles posted
Jeremy Harrell 10 articles posted
Tom Allchorne 11 articles posted
Joshua Payne 4 articles posted
Joanna Glasner 22 articles posted
Angela Sormani 3 articles posted
Erin Griffith 1090 articles posted
11-21-2009
11-19-2009
Joshua Payne 2 articles posted
Bernard Vaughan 38 articles posted
Tom Allchorne 0 articles posted
Connie Loizos 533 articles posted
Robert Venes 14 articles posted
Justin Pugsley 7 articles posted
Chris Spink 2 articles posted
Andrew Scurria 6 articles posted
Sarah Young 5 articles posted
Nancy Gordon 6 articles posted
Michael Baron 4 articles posted
Dan Primack 0 articles posted
Erin Griffith 6 articles posted
Megan Davies 8 articles posted
Ari Nathanson 4 articles posted
Adam Noren 0 articles posted
Ben Klayman 1 articles posted
Adam Lashinsky 0 articles posted
Felix Salmon 1 articles posted
Joe Weisenthal 1 articles posted
Deborah Gage 173 articles posted
11-16-2009
Quentin Webb 1 articles posted
George Chen 3 articles posted
WordPress 0 articles posted
Aimee Donnellan 1 articles posted
Anil Jain 0 articles posted
dan primackk 0 articles posted





Nothing is more frustrating than expecting a check and then not getting it, and no one knows that better than the former shareholders of PayQuik.com.

In a complaint filed in Delaware federal court recently, the representative of the former stockholders of PayQuik sued Citibank )PayQuik’s acquirer) and U.S. Bank (the escrow agent) to compel the release of the balance of the escrow. At the closing of the transaction, Citibank placed 10% of the merger consideration in an escrow account with U.S. Bank. Near the end of the escrow period, Citibank brought an indemnification claim, but the stockholder representative asserted that Citibank submitted this claim one day after the escrow period had expired. As is typical, the escrow bank took no position on the dispute, so the stockholder representative decided to seek a court order directing release of the funds.

This raises an interesting question that we have come across on other transactions: What options do the former stockholders of an acquired company have if the acquirer brings a claim near the end of an escrow period that the stockholders believe is either invalid or of little merit?

Read more »
Plan B and A123 By Howard Anderson



peHUB First Read Posted on: November 18th, 2009
peHUB First Read Posted on: November 16th, 2009
peHUB First Read Posted on: November 17th, 2009
Jason Calacanis To Start New Angel Group Posted on: November 16th, 2009
peHUB Second Opinion 11.16 Posted on: November 16th, 2009






Sign up for the peHUB Wire — your daily dose of private equity news and views from Dan Primack. Join over 50,000 subscribers in receiving the peHUB Wire - all for free!

 






DROP A TIP! Contact peHUB with Tips.

 


Copyright © 2006-2009, Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Site by Pixel Bridge