David Cowan: VC success is about company picking, not personality


For more than a century, the firm that is now Bessemer Venture Partners operated with a single limited partner, which provided enough capital to keep things running along.

Then, things changed. In 2007, the firm closed its seventh fund, and the first in its history to include multiple institutional LPs. Bessemer went back to the table, scaling up in 2011 with a $1.6 billion Fund VIII, its largest ever.  And ever since, Bessemer has actively invested across stages, with a focus on early-stage deals, through partner offices in the U.S., Europe, Latin America and India.

The firm has returned capital, as well. Bessemer has had several big exits in the past few years, including LinkedIn, Yelp, and Lifelock. In September, one portfolio company, cancer drug developer Acceleron Pharma, went public, while another, ad-tech provider Criteo, is on tap for a $190 million offering. Partners have racked up new investments this year, including leading a $45 million round for performance management software provider Adaptive Planning, and recently co-leading a $10 million round for Thinking Phone Networks, a unified communications platform.

At October’s Venture Alpha West conference, produced by Thomson Reuters, longtime Bessemer Partner David Cowan sat down with VCJ’s Lawrence Aragon to talk about the firm’s culture and evolving strategy, including why partners believe scaling up is in the best long-term interests of its investors.

The following Q&A is a summarized version of topics covered during their chat, from partner retention to fund performance. It was edited for clarity.

Q:  What motivated the decision to bump up the size of your last fund?

A: By scaling, we get access to a larger pool of opportunities, so we have a better chance of getting at the best ones. But just raising larger funds, that’s not scaling a venture fund. The question is how can you do early-stage investing, do it well, understand the areas, but do more of it?

A few years ago, when we decided to do an India fund, we went out and talked to limited partners for the first time. But later we realized that raising funds around particular countries was not the optimal way to do it. We needed to be able to say, for instance, that we are no longer interested in infrastructure deals in India. We like high-tech deals in India, but those require less capital. We realized the best way to invest is to be able to dynamically allocate capital (through a single large fund).

Q: In regards to the investment culture at Bessemer, do you operate differently than other large venture firms?

A: We’re not a personality-centric firm. If you look at most of the great venture firms out there, they tend to be personality-centric. What does Mike Moritz think about it? What does John Doerr think? If those decisions all go through a single person, either all those decisions are not going to be made well, or you’re going to tax that person’s time too much.

At Bessemer, any one of us could be hit by a bus tomorrow, and we could continue on OK. We also have a process for reviewing and churning partners. This is how we make sure that everyone is performing well. Every one of us has to be reviewed and invited back every year. There’s no tenure. There’s no entitlement. Compensation is balanced and fair. And we don’t have a situation like having a guy who’s been around 10 years and is sucking up most of the carry. That happens in personality-centric firms.

Also, no partner at Bessemer has voluntarily left to go to another venture firm.

This story first appeared in Reuters Venture Capital Journal. Subscribers can read the original story here. To subscribe to VCJ, please email [email protected]

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock