Less than three weeks ago, former U.S. Rep. Barney Frank caught some people by surprise when he came out in support of lifting the $150 million threshold for firms to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
After all, this was the man who co-authored the Dodd-Frank financial reform act that led to the majority of private equity firms coming under the scrutiny of the SEC. Frank said at Private Equity International’s CFO COO Forum Jan. 21 he’d “seriously recommend” Congress look at raising the $150 million threshold. Frank said the SEC should get the power to adjust the amount upwards after a certain period of years.
Dodd-Frank mandated private equity firms with $150 million or more in assets under management to register with the SEC, which gives the agency the authority to examine their books and practices. To meet requirements that go along with registration, firms have had to beef up their compliance operations. The intent of the closer scrutiny was to protect the markets from “systemic risk,” though many argue private equity firms, especially small and mid-market shops, represent no such risk.
Many Republicans agree with Frank. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives in January passed a bill that would exempt certain fund managers from SEC registration. Under HR 37 the SEC would not count SBIC funds against the $150 million AUM threshold, reducing the cost of compliance for some firms. (See “Republicans push back on Dodd-Frank.”)
Compliance costs have become a major issue in private equity, especially at smaller firms. One GP at a major New York buyout fund said at a recent cocktail reception that compliance has represented the majority of the rising costs of running the firm. For big firms, these rising costs are manageable. Smaller firms, however, face the same type of regulatory burden but with fewer resources.
“It’s eaten into their bottom line vs. a $500 million fund,” said Brendan Tyne, managing director of the U.S. office for Augentius, a private equity fund administrator. “A lot of smaller funds, if they get close to $150 million, they don’t want to bring in more.”
Stepped-up compliance efforts at middle-market sponsors may be diverting resources from deal-making and causing firms to lose out on as many as one or two acquisition opportunities a year, said Anne Anquillare, co-founder and CEO of PEF Services, a fund administrator for small and mid-sized managers, at the Small Business Investor Alliance (SBIA) Northeast Private Equity Conference on Jan. 20.
David Bailey, a co-founder of Augentius who works in the firm’s London office, said regulations are even stricter in Europe, even as the industry becomes more global. Additional barriers to entry in the form of stiff compliance rules may actually hurt investors.
“The big issue is both the regulators and the industry constantly need new people coming into the market,” Bailey said. “There needs to be the constant regeneration of people that spin out from firms such as Carlyle Group or Blackstone Group, and the industry needs to encourage people like this… It needs first-time funds. From an investor’s point of view, guys in first-time funds are very hungry and they’re going to work very hard for their LPs to make money.”
Buyouts Snapshot is a brief look at selections of work that appear in our premium publication Buyouts. Buyouts is published by Buyouts Insider. Subscribers can read the full story here. Go here to subscribe to Buyouts.
Photo by Chris Witkowsky