More transparency, CalPERS, Buyers emerge in big TH Lee fund revamp, Brazil’s new president and private equity
Haaaaaaaapy Friday!
Judging by the crush of people with suitcases in Penn Station last night, I’m wondering how many readers will actually be heading to the office today. If you’re closing out the week today, we’re here for you! And we’ll be here for you on Monday, unlike some of our, ahem, competitors.
Transparency: Please CalPERS, more transparency.
CalPERS has been debating a plan to restructure its private equity program, establishing what it’s terming its four pillars: traditional GP relationships; focus on newer managers; and two direct investment vehicles that would target health and technology innovation and long-duration investments in larger businesses. (All fairly public so far).
The CalPERS board heard more details on the plan at its meeting earlier this month. One thing that stuck out to me was two CalPERS staffers, General Counsel Matthew Jacobs and CalPERS Investment Officer John Cole, arguing that the two direct investment vehicles needed to be less transparent than the overall PE program.
Jacobs said at the board meeting that too much transparency “would defeat the entire purpose of the endeavor … [private investments] are private for a reason, which is the financial information needs to be private and the people running them have these types of preferences.”
In response to board questions, Cole said the new vehicles would be exempt from public-records and public-meeting requirements, my colleague Dietrich Knauth wrote this week.
“Among the risks that we face is that we create a structure that is doomed to fail, that cannot actually operate in the private market,” Cole said. “An attempt to take private investing and make it public runs the risk of undercutting its very purpose and taking oxygen away from its ability to compete.”
Also, the operating budget for the two direct investment entities would not be open to the public, Cole said.
Matthews and Cole were talking about public transparency. CalPERS staff, on the other hand, would need access to detailed information about portfolio companies, Board Member Margaret Brown proposed at the meeting. Staff members agreed with that assertion, saying that CalPERS would get at least as much information from the new funds as it gets from its current GPs.
SUBSCRIBE to get the Wire in your inbox every morning. It’s free.
If you do not receive this within five minutes, please try and sign in again. If the problem persists, please
email: subscriptions@peimedia.com.